<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 360Flex &#8211; Flex vs HTML5: Flex work pays today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/</link>
	<description>Home to news for 360&#124;Flex, 360&#124;MAX and RIAdventure 360 events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>The shift is to the mobile browser from the desktop. Once you process that and then realize that in the mobile universe WebKit is used on IPhone/IPad devices AND Android which together make up 90% of the smart devices... WebKit is to the mobile browser what M$ hoped IE would be to the desktop. You are right. Flash is going no where on the desktop browser because the desktop browser is going no where. Ultimately there will be more mobile browsers serving up HTML 5 than desktop browsers serving up Flash... way more. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shift is to the mobile browser from the desktop. Once you process that and then realize that in the mobile universe WebKit is used on IPhone/IPad devices AND Android which together make up 90% of the smart devices&#8230; WebKit is to the mobile browser what M$ hoped IE would be to the desktop. You are right. Flash is going no where on the desktop browser because the desktop browser is going no where. Ultimately there will be more mobile browsers serving up HTML 5 than desktop browsers serving up Flash&#8230; way more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makina</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Makina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>THANKS FOR ADMİN.NİCE SHARİNG.VERYY NİCE.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANKS FOR ADMİN.NİCE SHARİNG.VERYY NİCE..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3942</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-3942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by 360Flex: New blog post: 360Flex - Flex vs HTML5: Flex work pays today http://bit.ly/b3uCmP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by 360Flex: New blog post: 360Flex &#8211; Flex vs HTML5: Flex work pays today <a href="http://bit.ly/b3uCmP.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b3uCmP..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidjmcclelland</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3940</link>
		<dc:creator>davidjmcclelland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-3940</guid>
		<description>I am too hungry to stop making buggy whips right now. I am not too desperate to keep an eye on what is happening with other technologies, just like when I used to develop in Director, or FileMaker, or Basic, or Pascal... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am too hungry to stop making buggy whips right now. I am not too desperate to keep an eye on what is happening with other technologies, just like when I used to develop in Director, or FileMaker, or Basic, or Pascal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with the analogy at all.  
 
But I do agree that the spec isn&#039;t ratified and apparently might not be until closer to 2022? So the argument (not aimed at you Paul) that Flash is dead now and the &quot;open web&quot; of HTML5 is the &quot;way and the light&quot; is false and misleading.  
 
I&#039;d argue against anyone building anything on any platform with Beta, let alone Alpha, heavens no pre-Alpha technologies. That&#039;s not planning for the future, that&#039;s gambling. It might pay off, or you spend the time to rewrite your app to the spec that won, or at least the spec that is current.  
 
Our point is Flex/Flash pays right now. So those arguing it&#039;s death obviously aren&#039;t looking for HTML5 work, since 18 jobs is pretty tight competition, LOL. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t agree with the analogy at all.  </p>
<p>But I do agree that the spec isn&#039;t ratified and apparently might not be until closer to 2022? So the argument (not aimed at you Paul) that Flash is dead now and the &quot;open web&quot; of HTML5 is the &quot;way and the light&quot; is false and misleading.  </p>
<p>I&#039;d argue against anyone building anything on any platform with Beta, let alone Alpha, heavens no pre-Alpha technologies. That&#039;s not planning for the future, that&#039;s gambling. It might pay off, or you spend the time to rewrite your app to the spec that won, or at least the spec that is current.  </p>
<p>Our point is Flex/Flash pays right now. So those arguing it&#039;s death obviously aren&#039;t looking for HTML5 work, since 18 jobs is pretty tight competition, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Carney</title>
		<link>http://www.360flex.com/blog/2010/02/360flex-flex-vs-html5-flex-work-pays-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360flex.com/?p=1330#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>The HMTL 5 spec is not ratified yet, so it is still &quot;alpha&quot; or maybe even &quot;beta&quot; right now, which will account for the smaller number. 
 
But as with building a new business, keep in mind your goals: work today or prepared for tomorrow. I am sure the buggy whip companies would have made the same arguments you are making. 
 
That&#039;s not to say that Flex/Flash will go the way of the buggy whip (that is yet to be determined), but if Flash is not the major platform in 2-4 years, then it would look that way in retrospect. Of course, there are still cobol programmers today... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HMTL 5 spec is not ratified yet, so it is still &quot;alpha&quot; or maybe even &quot;beta&quot; right now, which will account for the smaller number. </p>
<p>But as with building a new business, keep in mind your goals: work today or prepared for tomorrow. I am sure the buggy whip companies would have made the same arguments you are making. </p>
<p>That&#039;s not to say that Flex/Flash will go the way of the buggy whip (that is yet to be determined), but if Flash is not the major platform in 2-4 years, then it would look that way in retrospect. Of course, there are still cobol programmers today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
